Want to stay in your house, not a nursing home?

Check out my interview with Tom Martin

Aging gracefully doesn’t just happen, but it is possible. Where we live throughout elderhood is a major contributor to how well we age. In more than 30 years of professional practice, I have had one client tell

me that she actually wants to go to a nursing home when she reaches an advanced age. All the rest want to stay at home and age-in-place.  Many of our boomer clients are concerned about where their parents will live.  It takes flexible planning ahead of time, or crisis management at the moment of need, to achieve this important goal.  I was recently interviewed by Tom Martin for the Lexington Herald Leader on Aging in Place.  Click here for the article or here for the podcast of the entire interview.

In the interview I refer to a book by David Solie, How to Say it to Seniors, Closing the Communication Gap with our EldersI found it very helpful and can recommend the book to anyone who needs to communicate better with their seniors.

Scroll down and leave a comment about what concerns you the most about a long-lived life; yours, or someone you care about.

 

Moving beyond the irrational

This is a guest post by Mike Wagner, analyst for D. Scott Neal, Inc., written as part of his end-of-day  analysis of markets and securities on January 20, 2017, reflecting on the inauguration of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of  the United States. Following his astute analysis of the day’s volatility, he wrote to me:

I have ruminated on today’s events for much of the afternoon. I seem to be caught between those who think the world stopped spinning at noon today and those who believe it began spinning again after an eight-year hiatus. Maybe it is an appropriate irony, then, I have so little to say on such a momentous day. It struck me while looking at the day’s volatility how incredible it is that in such a divided country a peaceful transition of power could occur even still. Our financial markets function still; our communications function still; save for a small few who will take absolutely any opportunity to loot and burn, our streets remain free of other-than-usual violence still; in short, the Republic survives.

I think back to my freshman year at the University of Kentucky when, for a history class, I spent the afternoon in Special Collections breathlessly reading and re-reading the 1942 speech H.L. Donovan, then-president of the University, gave in response to America’s entry into the Second World War and the University’s role in the same. He spoke with great eloquence of the sacrifices that victory in that conflict would require, noting that the country had discovered it could not have the flying fortresses, ships, tanks, guns, and other supplies necessary to successfully wage war without giving up many of the comforts and conveniences of everyday life. I wonder what sacrifices might be required for this freedom of ours to continue through what feel to be very troubled times. I wonder also what sacrifices I have ever had to offer for the enjoyment of this democracy, if, indeed, I have offered any. Reading the letter quoted by Senator Schumer during this morning’s inauguration proceedings of one Major Sullivan Ballou to his soon-to-be widow leads me to wonder who indeed loves democracy in its ideal as opposed to loving it only insofar as its abstract supports the particular philosophies to which one may subscribe?

These questions make exceedingly poor market analysis, I grant, but their answers, at present, lend me the same conclusion I have of the market itself on a day like today: I don’t know. No one, of course, knows what the market is going to do. That said, much of the work we do here ultimately rests on the premise that there is a psychology to the market crowd which might be irrational itself but which may be rationed through nonetheless, ultimately giving some sense of clarity. I find myself to be remarkably unclear at the moment, despite the felicity of the Elder signals. So, for tonight, I’ll close with a simple but sincere prayer: God help us.

Trump-o-nomics

It’s still a bit early to say much, but readers have asked for a take on Trumponomics and what the results of the election might mean to your personal finances. I think we can all probably agree with The Economist when it wrote in late November, “For the moment, the policy priorities of the Trump administration-in-waiting are a basket of unknowables.”  To the extent that we can rely upon probability theory and early indications, we can make some pretty well-educated guesses about what could happen going forward. So here goes.